Archive for the ‘ SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ’ Category
Finally some good news – please see as below – published in the Telegraph 24 June 2011:
Wildebeest migration safe after Serengeti road plans scrapped
Plans have been shelved to build a controversial road across the Serengeti National Park which threatened the annual wildebeest migration between Tanzania and Kenya.
Conservationists warned that opening the wilderness to public traffic would have blocked the route of one million animals as they move north each year.
The new road, to be used by 800 vehicles a day, would have cut across the migration’s path, raised chances of animals being hit by cars, and brought pollution and human germs into the ecosystem.
Now the Tanzanian government has confirmed that it will not upgrade an existing dirt road – used only for tourists on safari – to an asphalt route open to all traffic. “The proposed road will not dissect the Serengeti National Park and therefore will not affect the migration,” Ezekiel Maige, Tanzania’s minster for natural resources and tourism, wrote in a letter to UNESCO’s World Heritage Centre. The Serengeti National Park is a World Heritage Site.
Tanzania’s president, Jakaya Kikwete, had previously thrown his support behind the plans, arguing that the national reserve cut off businesses in the country’s north from markets.
“I think that the government has just come to realise what’s at stake,” said Richard Bigurube, the former director general of the Tanzanian National Parks Authority, who now works with the Frankfurt Zoological Society’s Africa office.
“If we had gone ahead with a commercial road through there, it would have had a very severe impact.” But there were concerns that the Tanzanian government might dust off plans for the road in the future.
“I’m not celebrating, I think this is a trick,” said Uwe Skrzypczak, a German wildlife photographer who helped found a Facebook page, Stop the Serengeti Highway, which has more than 40,000 fans.
“We have heard that UNESCO was going to cancel the Serengeti’s status as a World Heritage Site if the road went ahead, and there is a big UNESCO conference about this next week.
“The timing is interesting. I think the decision has been made because of that meeting, but there is no way to say that the road won’t be built in three years, four years, ten years.”
You may be following the very controversial Serengeti Highway proposal. Below is a small summery …
Briefing Document Background
• Road proposed to run through the Serengeti, from Arusha to Musoma.
• Strongly opposed by many groups, including environmentalists, scientists, tourists and tour operators – including TATO and several members of ETOG.
• Suggestion that the project is to be funded by the Tanzanian government and members of mining and industrial groups, particularly since the withdrawal of support from the Indian government and the World Bank .
This coincides with the proposal for a soda ash extraction plant on Lake Natron, and newly discovered oil fields in Uganda.
• Investigating the possibility of alternative routes to the south of the park or through Kenya has been suggested. Both the German government and the World Bank have offered to finance the research and development of this.
• EIA conducted by the Tanzanian Ministry of Infrastructure Development and Tanzanian National Roads Agency. Draft submitted October 2010 after the decision to build the road had been passed.
• Despite widespread opposition the current proposal is still going ahead, with markers already being laid down. It is expected that the road will carry 800 vehicles (mostly trucks) per day by 2015, and 3000 vehicles per day (one every 30 seconds) by 2035.
Reasons for the Road
The stance of Tanzanian Government
• Will help the population of north western Tanzania to become more connected to the rest of the country.
• Was a 2005 election pledge the government is determined to keep.
• Environmental damage kept to a minimum by leaving 40km stretch unpaved through the park.
• Will provide the spur for essential economic development in the region o The road will be a key to providing transport links to a proposed soda ash extraction plant on the shores of Lake Natron.
• Alternative routes and the option of building a raised highway considered too expensive.
• Opposition to the road labelled as “unpatriotic”.
Reasons for Opposition
• No EIA conducted until after plans were passed.
• Huge disruption and damage to wildlife:
o Through disruption to natural migration routes; of wildebeest and elephants in particular.
o Through disturbances to the sensitive habitat of rhino.
o Through human interference and easy access for poachers.
o Through the introduction and spread of diseases and invasive weeds.
o Loss of habitat through disruption to grazing patterns would mean losing an important “carbon sink”.
• Loss of revenue through tourism:
o Likely to lose UNESCO World Heritage Status
o Loss of income and employment through less tourists – park entry, employment for park staff, income for local people, taxation revenue. This will lead to a general negative impact on the Tanzanian economy.
• Loss of foreign aid due to environmentally insensitive practice.
• International mining and industry companies helping fund the road have little interest in the well-being of local people.
• Will this pave the way for the loss of further World Heritage Sites?
Sources & Further Information
The Observer, 27th March 2011. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/27/serengeti-highway-national-park
eTurbo News, 1st April 2011. http://www.eturbonews.com/22099/tanzanian-presidents-motives-serengeti-highway-becoming-clear
The Ecologist, 13th August 2010. http://www.theecologist.org/News/news_round_up/795953/tanzania_urged_to_accept_world_bank_funding_of_alternative_serengeti_highway_route.html
Intrepid letter to Tanzanian Ministry of Tourism – 24th March 2011 ? TATO Press release – March 2011 ? Serengeti Watch – http://www.savetheserengeti.org/the-need-for-serengeti-watch/#axzz1IZgi33q8
Tanzanian government’s EIA executive summary available here: http://www.savetheserengeti.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/eia-part-i.pdf
Source – Frankfurt Zoological Society: www.fzs.org
Reintroduction is always is the last effort to make sure that a species is not forever lost – and more expensive than protecting a species properly in the first place. To bring back a species that has been exterminated or is on the brink of extermination is always a very expensive undertaking.
The Serengeti Rhino Repatriation Project (SRRP), aimed at boosting the small Serengeti rhino population with an additional 32 rhinos, is a complex, risky and expensive undertaking. Reintroduction is always more expensive and difficult than protecting a key species in situ properly in the first place. Whether we are talking about bringing oryx back to the Arabian deserts, vultures to the Alps or rhinos to the Serengeti – the reintroduction is always the last effort to make sure that a key species is not forever lost.
Adding an additional 32 rhinos to the existing small Serengeti population has the potential to create a real stronghold for the Eastern Black Rhino population. Returning the rhinos is not only helping maintain diversity in the Serengeti, it is also having a profound positive impact on the management of the park and the general biodiversity conservation of the ecosystem.
The actual transfer of the rhinos from South Africa to the Serengeti is only a small – albeit the most spectacular – part of the Serengeti Rhino Repatriation Project. The major goal of the project is re-invigorating law enforcement and ecosystem protection systems in the Serengeti – without protecting the vital resources, conservation is lost.
The project’s contribution into the Serengeti expands over a period greater than five years. The previous two years were used to improve security in the National Park and the surrounding protected areas. An elite rhino task force was established, every park ranger attended an intense six-week basic training course, communications and equipment were put in place and most importantly a renewed spirit of pride and professionalism has been injected into the National Parks system giving emphasis on resource protection, not just for the rhinos but for the whole ecosystem. These efforts will carry on beyond the culmination of the SRRP and will continue providing safety to the Serengeti all its inhabitants.
The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) provides strict guidelines for reintroductions; in the case of the Serengeti the focus of these were the removal of the original threat that led to the near-extermination of the species. The rhinos were wiped out in the 1980’s by poaching, putting resource protection and security at the forefront of the Serengeti Rhino Repatriation Project. A series of studies looking at habitat requirements (vegetation, cover and water availability) concluded that the habitat in the Serengeti is still intact and ideal for rhinos. The result of these studies also helped to pinpoint where the first area of release is located.
Another condition imposed by the IUCN was to ensure the animals are monitored closely after their release. The rhinos will be followed twenty-four hours a day for the next few years. This effort will make certain that security is maintained and that the animals are adapting to new challenges: change to new food, exposure to new diseases and new social set up.
The Paul Tudor Jones Family Foundation generously provided 4,7 million US Dollars for the five year program to increase and maintain security in the Serengeti. The Serengeti native Eastern Black Rhino (Diceros bicornis michaeli) – named after the late Michael Grzimek – was available for reintroduction from a breeding project in South Africa. Under South African law these animals belong to a private owner who had to be reimbursed for all the costs of raising and maintaining this population. Again this was made possible by a grant from the Paul Tudor Jones Family Foundation of over 2,35 million US Dollars. After purchase, the animals were formally donated to the government of South Africa, which will hand them over to the government of Tanzania after arrival in the Serengeti. Under Tanzanian law, rhinos cannot be owned privately but will remain under the ownership of the Government and its agent, the Tanzania National Parks Authority (TANAPA). The rhinos need to be transported by air from their breeding ranch in South Africa and in order to accomplish this feat a large Hercules C-130 transport aircraft has been chartered. Though the aircraft is quite large, a maximum of six rhinos can be transported at a time due to weight limitations. Six flights will take place to accommodate the transport of all 32 rhinos over the next two years. Transport aircraft this size are expensive and the flights have been made possible by a grant of 650,000 US Dollars from the US Fish and Wildlife Service, and assistance from Ms. Amy Robbins in partnership with the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and the Nduna Foundation (USA).
The project is guided by a technical committee appointed by the Tanzanian Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism, with members representing Tanzania National Parks, Ngorongoro Conservation Area, the Wildlife Division, Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute, the Grumeti Fund and Frankfurt Zoological Society. We are looking forward to rebuilding a healthy rhino population and providing exceptional security and wellbeing to all creatures of the Serengeti Ecosystem in the years to come.
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Frankfurt Zoological Society: www.fzs.org
blank
A Luxury Travel Blog